“Panties for Peace” Campaign Spawns Online Game Friday, Nov 2 2007 

by Shah Paung, The Irrawaddy, 2 Nov 2007

Panty PowerThe “Panties for Peace” campaign, aimed at embarrassing the Burmese regime, has spawned an online flash game. Players are challenged to bombard an image of junta leader Than Shwe with missiles in the shape of women’s underwear, scoring points for direct hits.

A bouncing Than Shwe disappears with each successful hit. “Brutal Burmese dictators believe contact with women’s underwear will sap their powers. Hope they’re right? READY…AIM…VOTE!” online players are told.

The game was inspired by an international “Panties for Peace” campaign encouraging critics of the regime to bombard embassies with packages containing women’s underwear. It was created by a San Francisco-based flash game group, Mochi Media, Inc.

The game’s Web site declares: “In support of a recently launched global campaign calling on people to ‘fling’ women’s panties at Burmese embassies around the world, we crafted a ‘voting game’ where everyone can express their opinion.”

Ying Tzarm, a co-founder of Lanna Action for Burma, one of the organizers of the “Panties for Peace” campaign, said of the online game: “It’s great. Everyone can play it.”

Aung Moe Win, a Burmese living in the US, is among the enthusiastic players. “This is the first game featuring a Burmese general,” he said.

SDP Applies For Protest Permit During ASEAN Summit; Burma Crisis A Symptom Of Asean’s Flaws Friday, Nov 2 2007 

SDP applies for protest permit during ASEAN summit, SDP, 2 Nov 2007

ASEAN 13th Summit logoThe Singapore Democrats have applied for a license to hold a protest on 19 Nov 07 during the ASEAN Summit (18-22 Nov 07). The application was submitted yesterday.

ASEAN heads of government will be in Singapore for its annual meeting during which it will sign its charter, a full 40 years after its inception.

The charter promises to look into the protection of human rights in ASEAN states.

But the promise already looks very unpromising given the fact the charter will be signed in Singapore, a state that prohibits protests (with the exception, of course, of those aligned with the PAP). In addition, the Singapore Government is the current chair of the regional body.

Nevertheless, it is important that democrats and human rights defenders across the region continue their campaign to impress upon the member states that democracy plays a vital part in the region’s development.

As such, the planned protest on 19 Nov, Monday, outside the Shangri-la Hotel where the summit is taking place will be an important event.

The protest will also be used to express the Singaporean community’s anger at the representatives from Burma. We are determined to show our solidarity with the oppressed people of Burma and continue our call for the military junta to restore peace and democracy in that country.

It will also be a prime opportunity to press ASEAN to take firm action against the pariah regime that has no business participating in the summit.

In light of all this, the SDP calls on the PAP Government not to make a laughing stock of Singapore: You cannot chair ASEAN, sign a charter pledging support on human rights, and then ban a protest at the summit.

The hypocrisy is too glaring, even by PAP’s standards.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Burma crises a symptom of Asean’s flaws, The Nation, 2 Nov 2007

Singapore - Prominent human rights activists noted that there are many disturbing parallels between the crises in Burma and Asean.

“Asean’s inaction on Burma reflects Asean’s institutional weaknesses”, said Debbie Stothard of the Alternative Asean Network on Burma.

It can be recalled that Asean came out with a statement expressing ‘revolt at the violent crackdown’, after the violent dispersals of protest actions in Burma. Stothard said this statement is not enough and Asean can do more actions considering the influence that Asean countries can exert on Burma.

She noted that “Burma, whose military is the largest consumer of fuel in the country, relies on petrol and diesel from Malaysia and Singapore. Thailand and Singapore are the biggest sources of Burma’s foreign direct investments.” (Pseudonymity: See ASEAN should stop passing the buck on Burma)

Burma’s military junta also relies on Singapore’s financial services to store and move the wealth that they drain away from the country. Indonesia currently chairs the United Nations Security Council, the body most feared and respected by Burma’s military junta.

Why can’t Asean take decisive action to pressure Burma move towards freedom and democracy”?

Stothard also said that Asean has failed to act on other burning issues such as the extrajudicial killings in the Philippines and the increasing violence in southern Thailand.

“If Asean cannot deal with problems in our own backyard, how can we hope Asean to be truly responsive to the dynamics in the region?”, Stothard declared.

Rafendi Djamin, meanwhile of the Solidarity for Asian Peoples’ Advocacy Working Groups on Asean and Human Rights, said that there is a gap between Asean policymakers and citizens.

“The Asean policymakers fail to respond to the people’s issues that is why people are indifferent to the Asean,” Djamin said.

Djamin challenged civil society groups to push Asean to transform from a highly elitist to a more people-oriented institution.

Burma’s Generals Hit Where It Hurts Friday, Nov 2 2007 

by Bertil Lintner, Asia Times Online, 2 Nov 2007

BANGKOK – For Htet Tay Za, a 19-year-old member of Myanmar’s elite who attends an exclusive and expensive international school in Singapore, life is often a party. A picture recently obtained by the Chiang Mai-based publication The Irrawaddy shows the young man being kissed on the cheek by a bikini clad Caucasian woman.In another portrait, the partying youngster is seen in festive mood beside a male friend puffing on a water pipe. {Pseudonymity: Tay Za’s Son Ridicules US Sanctions}

But the party may be over soon for Htet Tay Za, as his father who pays the bills for his lavish lifestyle, Tay Za, figures prominently in an October 19 executive order from the US Treasury Department that aims to block his assets and make it illegal for US citizens to have any business dealings with him and his private companies.

Earlier US sanctions, first imposed in 1997 and increased following an attack on pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and her followers in May 2003, were often criticized because they broadly banned all new investment into and imports from Myanmar. The latter measures forced textile factories to close down or to move across the border to Thailand. Thousands of workers lost their jobs, while the economic impact on members of the ruling junta was minimal.

This time, however, the US has imposed what it is referring to as “smart sanctions” that target specific individuals and companies. The punitive tactic is similar to the one the US applied in September 2005 against Banco Delta Asia in Macau, which the Treasury Department referred to in a statement at the time as “a willing pawn for the North Korean government to engage in corrupt financial activities”.

The move froze US$24 million in assets belonging to companies controlled by the North Korean government and as a result the entire bank almost collapsed. In the end, the money was released and moved to a bank in Russia. But it forced the North Korean government back to the negotiating table to resume the then stalled six-nation talks on Pyongyang’s controversial nuclear program.

The recent action against the Myanmar government and corporate entities still may not force the junta to embark on a serious dialogue with the country’s hobbled pro-democracy movement. Unlike previous US sanctions, however, this time they will certainly hurt the ruling generals and their business cronies more than ordinary Myanmar workers and citizens.

Tay Za is the 42-year-old manager of the Myanmar-based Htoo Trading Company, which among other subsidiaries controls the Singapore-registered Htoo Wood Products, Pavo Trading, and Air Bagan. Through the new sanctions, all of those companies are now blacklisted by the US government. The businessman is known to be very close to junta leader General Than Shwe and when he first launched into business he made a point of employing the children of powerful generals – which presumably paved the way for him to land lucrative government contracts.

Among those currently or formerly on his payroll are Aung Thet Mann, the son of General Shwe Mann, the junta’s third ranking official after Than Shwe and army chief General Maung Aye. According to a 2005 report in The Irrawaddy, Tay Za is also close to Than Shwe’s son, Kyaing San Shwe, whom Tay Za presented with a US-made Hummer, for undisclosed reasons.

Htoo Trading, which is engaged in timber exports, property development, palm oil production, arms deals and aviation, was one of two construction companies granted lucrative contracts to build the new national capital at Naypyidaw, to which the government moved from Yangon in November 2005. Also included on the new US sanctions list is Tay Za’s wife, Thidar Zaw, and another son, Pye Phyo Za, who spends most of his time in a luxury apartment in Singapore.

Junta who’s who

The US Treasury Department’s two new lists, one of which mentions by name 14 generals and government ministers, and the second an additional 11, are all now barred from entering the US and will have any assets they may hold in US financial institutions frozen. Those measures may be mainly symbolic, as few if any of the military officials have assets held in US banks or were likely planning to spend their next holiday in Hawaii or Florida.

But there are other important businessmen affiliated with the junta who could be adversely affected. The US sanction list notably includes Khin Shwe, president of Zaygabar and one of Myanmar’s leading real estate moguls, and Htay Myint, chief executive officer of the Yuzana Company, a large property developer.

Khin Shwe first attracted international attention in 1997 when he hired a US public relations firm, Bain and Associates Inc, in what turned out to be a futile attempt to improve the junta’s image and standing in Washington. Bain and Associates now appears to have washed its hands of Myanmar’s junta. The firm’s homepage, perhaps for good reason, omits Zaygabar among its list of “clients with whom we’ve worked”.

In Yangon, Zaygabar owns industrial parks, a golf and country club frequented by army officers, a hotel and the city’s tallest residential condominium. The fact that Khin Shwe’s daughter, Zay Zin Latt, is married to another of General Shwe Mann’s sons, Toe Naing Mann, some analysts believe may have helped him secure lucrative government contracts and concessions. Outside Myanmar, Khin Shwe is known to have business relations with companies in Japan, South Korea and Thailand. He is currently chairman of the Myanmar-Japan and Myanmar-Korean Friendship Associations and also chairs the Myanmar-Thai Development Corporation.

Htay Myint’s Yuzana is a somewhat smaller company, but has substantial investments in property as well as agricultural and fishery ventures. According to The Irrawaddy, he serves as president of the Construction Owners Association, the Fishing Vessel Owners Association and the Myanmar Project Association, and is the owner of one of Myanmar’s biggest supermarket chains. Htay Myint’s contacts with the junta were strongest with former prime minister Gen Khin Nyunt, who was ousted in a purge in October 2004. But the fact that Yuzana is still doing booming business in Myanmar indicates that he must have other high-level contacts as well.

Not on the US new sanctions list is Tun Myint Naing, also known as Steven Law , managing director of Asia World Company, the country’s biggest and most diversified conglomerate. Asia World was the other main contractor involved in the building of Naypyidaw.

Whether Law and his Asia World will be added to the list remains to be seen, but according to an e-mail received by Asia Times Online from the US State Department, what has been announced so far “is not meant as the final word”. Meanwhile, Asia World maintains close relations with the junta and it recently has been involved in road construction in northeastern Shan State, the renovation of Yangon’s international airport, and the construction of a deepwater port near the old capital. Law is also known to have had business interests in Singapore, including the recently dissolved Kokang Singapore Pte Ltd, and others through his wife, Cecilia Ng, who is a Singaporean citizen.

The effects of the new sanctions were felt within days of their announcement. Tay Za’s Air Bagan has cancelled its international flights to both Bangkok and Singapore and remains basically grounded . Banks in Singapore, the financial center of choice for Myanmar’s generals and junta-affiliated business tycoons, have reportedly become slow in processing any transactions to and from Myanmar.

The reason, some observers suggest, is that Singapore’s banks want to check whether any of their clients are on the US sanctions list – in which case they could face a similar situation to that of Macau’s Banco Delta Asia. Singapore is not legally obliged to uphold the new US sanctions, but its banks are evidently nervous about the adverse publicity the punitive measures could have on their global reputations. Air Bagan’s bank accounts in Singapore have already reportedly been blocked, though it’s unclear if this is a permanent or temporary intervention.

What is clear is that it will be much more difficult for Myanmar’s generals and their business associates to deposit both their legitimate and ill-gotten gains in Singaporean banks. Myanmar workers based abroad, many of whom send remittances to their relatives back home, will notably be less affected by the new measures as they tend to use informal underground banking systems such as “hawala” to avoid unfavorable exchange rates and excessive government taxes.

The new sanctions also likely mean less partying in Singapore for the generals, their cronies and siblings. And because most international bank transfers pass through either the US or Europe, whatever funds the junta already has parked in Singapore will likely need to stay there or risk being frozen or confiscated. The medium-term efficacy of the US’s smarter sanctions is more difficult to ascertain, as the junta will likely seek out new destinations for its funds. But suddenly life just got considerably harder for Myanmar’s ruling generals.

Bertil Lintner is a former correspondent with the Far Eastern Economic Review. He is currently a writer with Asia-Pacific Media Services.

31 Oct 1981 Friday, Nov 2 2007 

JBJ in 1981
J.B. Jeyaretnam: with garland, after 1981 victory (Photo: Straits Times)

JBJ 1981
Anson by-election: J.B. Jeyaretnam on a victory tour (Photo: Straits Times)

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

Day of democracy unforgotten – A tribute to Mr J B Jeyaretnam by Melvin Tan, 31 Oct 2007

On this day 26 years ago, Mr Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam of the Workers’ Party became the first opposition candidate to be elected since Singapore’s independence in 1965, ending the PAP’s one-party monopoly in Parliament.

He clinched Anson constituency, the same ward captured by WP’s founder and former Chief Minister, Mr David Saul Marshall, in 1961.

Upon his successful election as MP, Mr Jeyaretnam faced and fought against harsh odds.

Firstly, he was denied an office to conduct his Meet The People (MPS) sessions.

Secondly, the People’s Association grassroots refused to permit his access.

Nevertheless, he overcame these difficulties by holding MPS in a resident-supported makeshift office and organising his own grassroots body with the help of WP members.

One year later on 31 October 1982, the WP held the first Democracy Day Dinner in Anson in celebration the occasion’s anniversary.

A former district judge, Mr Jeyaretnam’s first bid for a seat in Parliament was in the 1972 general election (GE) in Farrer Park, a year after joining and reviving the WP.

Five electoral defeats (three GEs and two by-elections) later, he finally made a breakthrough in the 1981 by-election.

He was re-elected again in Anson in the 1984 GE.

Unfortunately, his second tenure was shorter this time.

Two years later in 1986, a heavy fine saw him disqualified from Parliament, losing his seat and the party’s sole seat in the process.

He was also barred from contesting elections for five years.

Despite this, he continued to serve as WP’s Secretary-General and remained active, including offering free legal advice at the party’s headquarters.

Mr Jeyaretnam ventured to return for the GE immediately following the expiry of his ban in November 1991 but snap polls called for in August 1991 was three months before he could do so.

A by-election was held in 1992 in Marine Parade GRC but a WP team slated to contest there did not manifest due to an unexpected glitch.

In the 1997 GE, Mr Jeyaretnam surfaced as a candidate again and led a team to Cheng San GRC.

He was unable to secure a victory but did well enough within close shot to earn a Non-Constituency MP (NCMP) seat.

Embroiled in a defamation suit, Mr Jeyaretnam was declared a banrkrupt and once again had his NCMP seat vacated in 2000.

In 2001, Mr Jeyaretnam’s 30-year helm came to a conclusion when he left the party after what appeared to be incrementally inevitable disagreements with the younger WP leadership.

He continued to be a voice for the people, speaking at political forums and participating in political activities.

The Think Centre organised an unprecedented “Save JBJ Rally” in April 2001 in his support.

Needless to mention, he was invited to be the prime speaker of that rally.

In 2007, at the age of 81, he was finally discharged from bankruptcy and announced his plan to form a new political party, tentatively named Reform Party or Democratic Reform Party (DRP).

Hopefully, his Reform Party or DRP will be approved registration in due course and gain momentum to scale new heights in the Singapore political arena.

A salute to you, Mr Jeyaretnam, for your undying spirit.

31 October 1981 will forever remain a day to be remembered in history.

ASEAN Should Stop Passing The Buck On Burma Friday, Nov 2 2007 

by ALTSEAN-Burma, 25 Oct 2007

Burma-BrieferThe briefer asserts that ASEAN countries must exercise their substantial influence on Burma’s military leaders to secure the delivery of genuine political and economic reforms, instead of using China as an excuse for inaction. The briefer reveals that:

* Burma relies on petrol and diesel supplies from Malaysia and Singapore to keep business running and military vehicles on the road. The military is the biggest consumer of fuel.

* Burma relies on trade with ASEAN for 51.3% of foreign exchange revenue, with gas sales to Thailand alone accounting for 48.4% in 2005/06.

* Burma relies on Thailand and Singapore as their biggest sources of new Foreign Direct Investment, constituting a total of 98.61% of FDI in the past 2 years.

* Burma relies on Singapore’s financial services to store and move the wealth that they drain away from Burma.

The briefer recommends an ASEAN freeze or even a slowdown on economic, material, and diplomatic support in order to shepherd the regime to political dialogue and the achievement of genuine reforms. Action should include a temporary freeze on large Burmese-held bank accounts and other financial assets in Singapore as part of a money-laundering review.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

This section on Singapore is from the 7-page briefer by ALTSEAN-Burma

Singapore

Those at the top of the SPDC rely on Singapore for personal health and financial services. Singapore has also provided training for more than 5,000 SPDC officials through the Singapore Cooperation Program (SCP). Singapore in particular has assisted the SPDC in undermining the impact of US and EU sanctions. When US sanctions began to harm the SPDC in 2003, the junta instructed state entities and private businesses to begin using euros for international transactions. The SWIFT Singapore office provided four Burmese banks with the expertise to set up new banking systems to make this possible.

Singapore has strongly denied allegations that it allows banks to keep illicit funds on behalf on the generals, with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong recently saying that the country does not take “dirty money” and does not condone money laundering. However, Singapore has not clearly indicated how it has confirmed that large Burmese-held assets are not the ill-gotten gains of the junta and its cronies.

Singapore does well from its relationship with the regime. In 2005/6 Singapore’s exports to Burma were US$558.65 million, while its imports were $264.25 million. When Indonesia banned sand exports to Singapore in April 2007, they decided to import the sand (used for reclaiming land) from Burma instead. Singapore is also significant investor in Burma. According to official SPDC statistics, Singapore has injected over US$1.5 billion into Burma since 1988.